Lithium secondary battery

ABSTRACT

A lithium secondary battery including an internal electrode body contained in a battery case including a positive electrode, a negative electrode and a separator made of porous polymer, the positive electrode and the negative electrode are wound or laminated. A working volume ratio of the positive active material and the negative active material obtained by the positive active material weight being divided by the negative active material weight is within the range from 40% to 90% of the theoretical working volume ratio. The lithium secondary battery has high safety as well as high energy density by controlling the working volume of an electrode active material and the dispersion of the distribution of the working volume and in particular is preferably used for a drive motor of an electric vehicle.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION AND RELATED ART STATEMENT

The present invention relates to a lithium secondary battery which has extremely high safety as well as high energy density and in particular is preferably used for the drive motor of an electric vehicle.

In recent years, regulation of emissions of carbon dioxide has been highly demanded, with the environment protection movement reaching its heights in the background. The automobile industry, to replace automobiles using fossil fuels, such as vehicles driven by gasoline, is proceeding in earnest with development of motor-drive batteries that will be the key to putting EV into practical use with the aim of promoting the introduction of electric vehicles (EV) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEV).

As a battery for such EV and HEV, in recent years, attention has been paid to lithium secondary batteries with high energy density, which enables them to extend the running distance per charge compared to use of lead storage batteries or nickel hydrogen batteries.

In a lithium secondary battery, a lithium compound is used as a positive active material, while various carbon materials are used as a negative active material, and an organic solvent in which a lithium ion electrolyte is dissolved is used as an electrolyte solution, which constitutes the battery. At charging, lithium ions in the positive active material are transferred from the positive active material to the negative active material in the electrolyte solution, permeating a porous separator separating the positive active material and the negative active material. At discharge, on the other hand, the lithium which was captured by the negative active material is ionized and transferred to the positive active material, thus conducting charging/discharging.

Here, since a lithium secondary battery has a large energy density compared to a conventional secondary battery, strict guidelines are provided with regard to its safety. For example, according to the “Lithium Secondary Battery Safety Assessment Standard Guidelines (commonly called the SBA Guidelines)” issued by the Battery Association of Japan, a lithium secondary battery is required not to burst, nor catch on fire even if the entire amount of energy that was fully charged to its charging capacity were to be instantly discharged by an external short circuit or an internal short circuit caused by a nail (metal rod) piercing test, etc., giving rise to heat in the battery.

An internal short circuit similar to the above-described nail piercing test, may occur due to the fact that the appropriate quantity of working volume (filling weight) for the electrode active material has not been determined. Practically during the reaction at the time of charging, when lithium ions in the positive active material are captured by the negative active material, if the lithium ions are supplied in a quantity surpassing the lithium holding capacity (the lithium charge/discharge capacity, hereafter referred to as the “charge/discharge capacity”) possessed by the negative active material, metal lithium will be deposited on the surface of the negative active material. Deposition of this metal lithium may then cause dendrite growth, which could result in a short circuit between the positive active material and the negative active material. This dendrite growth is especially apt to occur at the first charging.

When an internal short circuit occurs due to this dendrite, as in the nail piercing test, the energy stored in the negative active material is immediately discharged, resulting in a thermal increase in the battery together with an internal pressure increase. In the worst case, the battery may burst or catch on fire. Since the quantity of energy to be stored in a lithium secondary battery with a large capacity for EV and the like is large, such an internal short circuit could lead to a deadly accident.

On the other hand, it is possible to make the charge/discharge capacity of the negative active material larger than the charge/discharge capacity of the positive active material in order to prevent the occurrence of such dendrite growth by metal lithium. However, unnecessary filling of the negative active material to an extreme extent is not preferred since it may decrease the energy density of the battery.

Accordingly, in theory, equalizing the charge/discharge capacity of the negative active material and the positive active material could make the energy density larger. Therefore, in forming a compact lithium secondary battery for conventional handy electronic equipment and the like, attention has been paid to this point, and design has been conducted by considering the entire working volume ratio of the positive and negative electrodes. Incidentally, the working volume ratio is the ratio of the positive and negative active materials defined as the value that is the working volume of the positive active material divided by the working volume of the negative active material.

However, a large capacity lithium secondary battery for EV and the like formed based on such a design principle leads to the problem that the rate of faulty product may be excessive. Regarding this problem, the present inventors thought that in a large capacity lithium secondary battery, the working volume ratio of the positive and negative active materials should be set to a sufficiently safe value so that dendrite growth of lithium metal would not occur across the entire charging/discharging region where the positive and negative electrodes face the other since the electrodes area is extremely large compared to a conventional compact lithium secondary battery.

That is, it is also thought to be of necessity to consider partial dispersion of the working volume ratios of the positive and negative active materials in each positive and negative electrode within a certain battery, namely the distribution of dispersion of the partial working volume ratios at each positive and negative electrode, such as spotted thickness of electrode active material layers and looseness/tightness of the filling state.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention was achieved by considering the problems of the prior art mentioned above. That is, according to the present invention, there is provided a lithium secondary battery, comprising: a battery case, and an internal electrode body contained in the battery case and including a positive electrode, a negative electrode and a separator made of porous polymer, the positive electrode and the negative electrode being wound or laminated so that the positive electrode and negative electrode are not brought into direct contact with each other via the separator, wherein a working volume ratio of the positive active material and the negative active material obtained by the positive active material weight being divided by the negative active material weight is within the range from 40% to 90% of the theoretical working volume ratio.

According to the present invention, there is further provided a lithium secondary battery comprising: a battery case, and an internal electrode body contained in the battery case and including a positive electrode, a negative electrode and a separator made of porous polymer, the positive electrode and the negative electrode being wound or laminated so that the positive electrode and negative electrode are not brought into direct contact with each other via the separator, wherein the minimum value of the working volume ratio of the positive and negative active materials is regarded as an experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ when the usage rate of the negative electrode is 100%, and the electrode areas of the positive and negative electrodes are divided into n elements respectively, yielding a ratio of the average value of working volume weight of the positive and negative active materials at the elements to be regarded as an average working volume ratio X_(av) while the working volume weight of the positive and negative active materials constitutes a normal distribution of dispersion σ, and, the faulty-rate of batteries using the elements is expressed with an upper probability Q(u) (where u=(X₃−X_(av))/σ) of the normal distribution, then, nxQ(u) being the faulty rate of the lithium secondary battery is set to be 1 ppm or less.

In such a lithium secondary battery of the present invention, the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ is preferably no less than 6 times the dispersion σ, and further preferably no less than 6 times and no more than 20 times the dispersion σ. In addition, where the ratio of the positive and negative active material weights when the charge/discharge capacity of the positive and negative materials is equal is regarded as the theoretical working volume ratio X₁, the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and the theoretical working volume ratio X₁ is preferably no less than 11 times the dispersion σ and further preferably no less than 11 times and no more than 30 times the dispersion σ.

Such a lithium secondary battery of the present invention is preferably adopted to a battery whose battery capacitance is no less than 5 Ah, and is preferably used for an electric vehicle or a hybrid electric vehicle.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing the structure of a wound-type internal electrode body.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing one embodiment of the structure of a lamination-type internal electrode body.

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view showing another embodiment of the structure of a lamination-type internal electrode body.

FIG. 4 is an explanatory view showing an example of a relationship between the working volume ratio of each positive and negative active material and energy density in a lithium secondary battery.

FIG. 5 is an explanatory view showing an example of the relationship between the working volume ratio of positive and negative active materials and the usage rate of a negative electrode in a lithium secondary battery.

FIG. 6 is an explanatory view showing another example of the relationship between the working volume ratio of positive and negative active materials and energy density in a lithium secondary battery.

FIG. 7 is an explanatory view showing another example of the relationship between the working volume ratio of positive and negative active materials and the usage rate of the negative electrode in a lithium secondary battery.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

As described above, a lithium secondary battery of the present invention ensures a high level of safety and has a high energy density, since the working volumes of the electrode active material as well as the dispersion of distribution of working volumes across the entire charging/discharging regions within the internal electrode body is controlled.

The embodiments of the present invention are described below. However, it goes without saying that the present invention shall not be limited to the embodiments below.

The internal electrode body of the lithium secondary battery of the present invention (hereinafter referred to as “battery”) comprises a positive electrode, a negative electrode and a separator made of porous polymer film, the positive electrode and the negative electrode being wound or laminated so that the positive electrode and negative electrode are not brought into direct contact with each other via the separator. In particular, as shown in FIG. 1, a wound-type internal electrode body 1 is formed by winding a positive electrode 2 and a negative electrode 3 having a separator 4 in between, and a lead line 5 is provided for each electrode 2, 3.

On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 2, the lamination-type internal electrode body 7 laminates the positive electrode 8 and the negative electrode 9 alternately via the separator 10, with lead lines 6 being connected to each of the positive and negative electrodes 8, 9 respectively. Such internal electrode bodies 1, 7 are basically configured to have a plurality of element batteries connected in parallel, the element battery consisting of a positive electrode and a negative electrode facing each other. The positive electrodes 2, 8 and the negative electrodes 3, 9 are formed in the shape of a thin plate with an electrode active material coated respectively onto aluminum foil and copper foil as base members.

On the other hand, an internal electrode body 19 with a lamination structure shown in the sectional view of FIG. 3 is configured having a positive active material layer 14 formed on one surface of a plate-like or foil-state positive base member 11 and a negative active material layer 15 formed on one surface of a negative base member 12, with the surfaces where the respective electrode active material layers are not formed with respect to each electrode basic member 11, 12 being electrically connected. In addition, a surface of a positive active material layer 14 and a surface of a negative active material layer 15 are laminated to face each other through a separator 17 or a solid electrolyte 18 by laminating a plurality of electrodes. The internal electrode body 19 in this case is configured so that the element batteries are connected in series, unlike the above-described internal electrode bodies 1, 7.

For a battery with any of the above-described structures, lithium transition metal compound oxides such as lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO₂), lithium nickel oxide (LiNiO₂), or lithium manganese oxide (LiMn₂O₄), etc., are generally used as a positive active material. In addition, in order to improve the conductivity of these positive active materials, it is frequently the case that a carbon powder such as acetylene black, graphite powder, etc., is mixed with the electrode active material. On the other hand, for the negative active material, an amorphous carbon material such as soft carbon or hard carbon, or carbon powder such as natural graphite, etc., is used.

As a separator 4 and the like, it is preferable to use a three-layer structural one in which a polyethylene film having lithium ion permeability and including micropores is sandwiched between porous polypropylene films having lithium ion permeability. This serves also as a safety mechanism in which, when the temperature of the internal electrode body is raised, the polyethylene film is softened at about 130° C. so that the micropores collapse to suppress the movement of lithium ions, that is, battery reaction. With this polyethylene film being sandwiched between polypropylene films having a softening temperature higher than the polyethylene film, it is possible to prevent contact/welding between the positive electrode 2 and the negative electrode 3.

In forming a battery using such members, at first, it is extremely important to know the extent of the lithium capacity of the positive and a negative active materials when the battery capacity is determined and when the weight per unit area of the electrode active material layer to be formed on each positive and negative electrode is determined.

Therefore, at first, the capacity per unit weight of the positive active material in the initial charging, namely the quantity of lithium ions dissociated in initial charging, is defined as the positive capacity (C_(c)). The capacity per unit weight of the negative active material in the initial charging, namely the quantity of lithium ions inserted in initial charging, is defined as the negative capacity (C_(a)). Thus, units for positive capacity as well as for negative capacity is expressed in “Ah/g”. Each positive and negative capacity is measurable, for example, by forming a coin cell using metal lithium at the respective opposite electrodes.

In particular, the positive capacity is determined as the initial charging capacity to be obtained, using metal lithium on the opposite electrode, and conducting constant current-constant voltage charging at a charging voltage in the case of using a battery, for example 4.1V. On the other hand, the negative capacity is determined as the initial charging amount to be obtained, using metal lithium on the opposite electrode and inserting lithium ions at constant current-constant voltage (5 mV) Incidentally, here, in the case where metal lithium is used on the opposite electrode, in terms of capacity measurement of the negative active material, it is a discharge reaction. Nevertheless it is expressed as charging in correspondence with the case it was used as a battery.

Based on the thus-obtained positive capacity and negative capacity, expressing the working volume of the positive active material in a certain battery as W_(c)(g), and the working volume of the negative active material as W_(a)(g), defining W_(c)/W_(a) as the ratio as a working volume ratio × where the working volume of positive active material was divided by the working volume of negative active material, and further defining the working volume ratio of each positive and negative active material as theoretical working volume ratio X₁ where at initial charging, the capacity of the whole positive electrode (unit: Ah) equals to the capacity of the whole negative electrode (unit: Ah), namely, constituting the following relationship:

C _(c) ·W _(c) =C _(a) ·W _(a),

then, X₁ is expressed as follows:

X ₁ =W _(c) /W _(a)(=C _(a) /C _(c))

Accordingly, the theoretical working volume ratio X₁ varies in accordance with the positive and negative capacity if the positive and negative active materials used differ.

Next, using positive and negative active materials with a clearly determined theoretical working volume ratio X₁, measuring the battery capacity and output by actually forming coin cells with a diameter of 20 mm having various working volume ratios X, so as to determine the lowest value X₂ for the working volume ratio (hereafter referred to as the “lowest working volume ratio X₂”) which enables the battery to be put to practical use, as well as the uppermost value X₃ for the working volume (hereafter referred to as the “experimental safe working volume ratio X₃”) with which safety is experimentally ensured. As an example, here, a test was conducted under a material system using lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO₂) as a positive active material and highly graphitized carbon fiber as a negative active material (hereafter the said material system will be referred to as “material system 1”). The results of this is shown in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5.

FIG. 4 is a graph showing the correlation between working volume ratio X and energy density. Here, energy density is determined by dividing the obtained discharging energy by total weight of the positive and negative active materials, under the condition that the quantities of the positive and negative active materials only were considered, and not the battery weight, including the weight of the battery case, etc. The theoretical working volume ratio X₁ in the said example is 2.92. In addition, with a working volume ratio of not less than 1.2, energy density scarcely depends on the working volume ratio, and thus can be regarded as almost constant. On the other hand, with a working volume ratio of no more than 1.2, a steep drop in energy density is observed. Thus, in this example, the lowest working volume ratio X₂ that enables the battery to be put into practical use is 1.2, this lowest working volume ratio X₂ being equivalent to 41% of the theoretical working volume ratio X₁.

FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the working volume ratio X and the usage rate of the negative electrode. Based on this it will be judged whether or not there is any possibility of lithium dendrite growth occurring. That is, in the case where the initial charging capacity obtained in a coin cell is greater than the entire negative capacity to be determined as the negative capacity C_(a) multiplied by filling quantity W_(a) of a negative active material (or C_(a)×W_(a)), telling that lithium ions surpassing the lithium holding quantity of the negative active material have been supplied, one can judge that there is possibility that lithium dendrite growth should happen.

Based on this judgment technique, in the theoretical working volume ratio X₁, the initial charging quantity coincides with the entire negative capacity. That is, the usage rate of the negative electrode obtained by dividing the initial charging quantity by the entire negative capacity must be 100% at the theoretical working volume ratio X₁. Actually, however, the usage rate of the negative electrode surpasses 100% even with a ratio of no more than the theoretical working volume ratio X₁.

Such results may be due to growth of lithium dendrite in regions such that the working volume ratio on the surface of the electrodes has deviated to some extent and that there are regions partially surpassing the theoretical working volume ratio X₁ even if the averaged working volume ratio, namely the working volume ratio for the entire coin cell, is no more than the theoretical working volume ratio X₁. Thus, from FIG. 5, the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ is judged to be 2.6. This experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ equivalent to 89% of the theoretical work volume ratio X₁.

Next, the results of a test that took place similarly to the above-described tests as another example under a material system using LiCoO₂ as positive active material and hard carbon as negative active material (hereafter referred to as “material system 2”) are shown in FIG. 6 and FIG. 7. The test results shown in FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 are similar to those in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5. The theoretical working volume ratio X₁ in the present example is 3.46. However, from FIG. 6 and FIG. 7, the lowest working volume ratio X₂ is judged to be 1.40 and the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ to be 3.10. Thus, the lowest working volume ratio X₂ and the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ are respectively 40% and 90% of the theoretical working volume ratio X₁.

Thus, even if the positive and negative active materials are different, since the lowest working volume ratio X₂ is around 40% of the theoretical working volume ratio X₁, and the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ is around 90% of the theoretical working volume ratio X₁, the working volume ratio X in forming the battery may be set between this lowest working volume ratio X₂ and the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃, enabling higher energy density and safety to coexist.

Next, based on the above-described knowledge, a case in which the electrode area is far broader than that in a coin cell, like an electrode used in a battery for an EV, etc., is considered. Here, in the case where an electrode with a large area is formed, the working volume ratios of each positive and negative active material will have a degree of dispersion depending on the accuracy of the electrode active material coating machine employed. Also within a single electrode sheet, it maybe impossible to avoid the occurrence of regions having partially different quantities of coating of electrode active material, such as places where there is unevenness in the coating state or portions where there are differences in thickness of electrode active material and the like. Under the circumstances, it is necessary to consider such dispersion statistically.

In order to examine the dispersion of partial working volume within an electrode with such a large area, an electrode is formed in which positive and negative active materials have been coated on one side of a metal foil, aiming at a certain working volume ratio X_(t). The electrode to be formed preferably has the same area as those for use in a large capacity battery planned to be actually used or an area even larger than that. Incidentally, the reason why only one surface of the metal foil is coated with an electrode active material is that dispersion taking place in the coating state on one surface may be set off by dispersion on the other surface side when both the surfaces are coated.

Next, circle plates with the same diameter of 20 mm as that of a coin cell are formed by punching as many as possible at random from an electrode, and the dispersion of their weights is examined. Here, the weight of the metal foil on each of the punched circle plates is deemed to be a constant, and weight dispersion is deemed to be due to the electrode active material coated thereon. Regarding the weight distribution obtained on an electrode active material as being a normal distribution, the weight average value W_(c−av) of a positive active material and its dispersion σ_(c) as well as the weight average value W_(a−av) of a negative active material and its dispersion σ_(a) are determined.

Thus the obtained W_(c−av), σ_(c), W_(a−av), and σ_(a) express the average working volume ratio X_(av) and dispersion σ in a battery as follows:

X _(av) =W _(c−av) /W _(a−av)

σ=(W _(a−av) ²σ_(c) ² +W _(c−av) ²σ_(a) ²)/W _(a−av) ⁴

Here, the average working volume ratio X_(av) is exactly the average working volume ratio in the circle plates obtained by punching. However, since this average working volume ratio X_(av) may be considered to be the same as the average working volume ratio in the battery, these will be treated equally below.

Here, a large size battery for an EV and the like can be considered to be configured by element batteries with a normal distribution comprising the above-described average working volume ratio X_(av) and dispersion σ, in the above-described example, element batteries of a diameter 20 mm and area of 3.14 cm² in the quantity of entire electrode area divided by the area of an element battery, being connected in parallel. In the case where any one of them surpasses the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ mentioned before, it is judged that there exists a risk in the battery of internal short circuit due to lithium dendrite growth. In that case, considering the above-described normal distribution, in theory it is impossible statistically to make the faulty rate completely null, but in practical terms, it is possible to make the faulty rate null.

That is, it will be fine if the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ is statistically larger than the dispersion σ to a sufficient extent. On the other hand, for example, considering a battery for an EV, since the faulty rate of the battery is required to be no more than 1 ppm, in this case, it is advisable to set the value of the electrode area per a battery divided by the area of element battery so that the value is multiplied by the faulty rate of the element battery, the resulting value being no more than 1 ppm. The idea of ensuring safety in such a battery may be expressed in an established form as follows.

That is, for each positive and negative active material, the charging/discharging capacities of each positive and negative active material in batteries respectively and independently formed with metal lithium to be used as the opposite electrodes are determined. Next, the weight ratio of each positive and negative active material giving the upper limit to make the usage rate of negative electrode in the battery formed based on the obtained charge/discharge capacity 100% is deemed to be the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃. By dividing the electrode area of each positive and negative electrode in one battery using that each positive and negative active material into n elements, the ratio of the average value of the weight distribution of each positive and negative active material coated on each element is deemed to be an average working volume ratio X_(av), and σ is deemed to be the dispersion when the weight distribution takes normal distribution. Under the conditions, when the upper probability Q(u) of the normal distribution being the faulty rate of batteries formed using each element satisfies the following relation:

Q(u)×n<1 ppm (where, u=(X ₃ −X _(av))/σ),

the faulty rate of a battery can be suppressed to no more than 1 ppm. Incidentally, “u(=(X₃−X_(av))/σ)” is a parameter, a so-called standard deviation, showing how much σ a deviation is placed from the average with dispersion σ as a unit.

Based on the idea of ensuring safety in such a battery, for both of the above-described material system 1 and material system 2, electrodes for a 20 Ah battery were formed using a reverse coater. For the material system 1, 2, 100 circle plates with diameter of 20 mm were formed by punching. The average working volume ratio X_(av) as well as dispersion σ was thus determined. As a result, for both material systems 1, 2, the dispersion σ of the average working volume ratios was 0.07. Here, since the actual area of an electrode for 20 Ah is around 12600 cm², with the number of elements n calculated to be 4013(=12600/3.14), thus no less than 6.2σ is to be necessary, calculated from a normal distribution function, in order to make the upper probability (the faulty rate) of normal distribution to be no more than 1 ppm. That is, it will be fine if the average working volume ratio X_(av) keeps a distance of no less than 6.2×0.07 from the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃, and with this an extremely highly safe battery will be realized.

In addition, since the difference between the theoretical working volume ratio X₁, and the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ is 0.32 (4.6σ) for the material system 1 and is 0.36 (5.1σ) for the material system 2, as shown in formerly described FIGS. 4 through 7, it will be fine if the average working volume ratio X_(av) keeps a distance of no less than around approximately 11σ, which is reached by the addition of 6.2σ, the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃, from the theoretical working volume ratio X₁.

Moreover, since the difference between the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ and the lowest working volume ratio X₂ is 1.4 for the material system 1 and 1.7 for the material system 2, as shown in formerly described FIGS. 4 through 7, the difference of these is respectively equivalent to 20σ and 24.3σ. Accordingly, since it is a battery using electrodes to be formed under the present conditions, with the average working volume ratio X_(av) keeping a range of a distance no less than 6.2σ but no more than 20σ from the experimental working volume ratio X₃, it is possible to realize a highly safe battery while maintaining a high energy density.

Here, in addition, since the difference between the theoretical working volume ratio X₁ and the lowest working volume ratio X₂ is 2.72 (38.9σ) for the material system 1 and 2.06 (29.4σ) for the material system 2, as in FIGS. 4 through 7, if the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and theoretical working volume ratio X₁ remains no less than 11σ but no more than 30σ, safety will be ensured.

Although the safety of a battery is ensured as described above, preferably, it is necessary to see to it that no statistical drop in energy density of element batteries will occur. That is, it is necessary for the average working volume ratio X_(av) of a battery to keep a sufficient distance from the lowest working volume ratio X₂ as well. This difference is also 6.2σ since the way of ensuring safety remains the same as described above. Therefore, with the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and the experimental working volume ratio X₃ of a battery being no less than 6σ but no more than 14σ, it is possible to make high energy density with greater homogeneity coexist with high safety. In other words, it will be fine if the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and the theoretical working volume ratio X₁ is between 11σ and 24σ.

As described above, a lithium secondary battery according to the present invention has excellent safety and produces a remarkable effect making it possible to obtain a battery with high energy density since the average working volume ratio value of the electrode active material is justified, by considering dispersion of the distribution of the electrode active material in the electrode. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A lithium secondary battery comprising: a battery case; and an internal electrode body contained in the battery case and including a positive electrode, a negative electrode and a separator made of porous polymer, the positive electrode and the negative electrode being wound or laminated so that the positive electrode and negative electrode are not brought into direct contact with each other via the separator, wherein a minimum value of a working volume ratio of each positive and negative active material is regarded as an experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ when the usage rate of the negative electrode is 100%, and electrode areas of the positive and negative electrodes are divided into n elements respectively, each of said elements being substantially the same size and having a diameter of about 20 mm, yielding a ratio of the average value of working volume weight of the positive and negative active materials at the element to be regarded as an average working ratio X_(av) while the working volume ratio of the positive and negative active materials constitutes a normal distribution of dispersion σ, n being at least 100, and the faulty rate of batteries using the elements is expressed with an upper probability Q(u)(where u=X₃−X_(av))/σ) of the normal distribution, then, nxQ(u) being a faulty rate of the lithium secondary battery is set to be 1 ppm or less.
 2. A lithium secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ is no less than 6 times the dispersion σ.
 3. A lithium secondary battery according to claim 2, wherein the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and the experimental safe working volume ratio X₃ is no less than 6 times and no more than 20 times the dispersion σ.
 4. A lithium secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein with the ratio of positive and negative active material weights being regarded as a theoretical working volume ratio X₁ when the charge/discharge capacity of positive and negative materials is equal, the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and the theoretical working volume ratio X₁ is no less than 11 times the dispersion σ.
 5. A lithium secondary battery according to claim 4, wherein the difference between the average working volume ratio X_(av) and the theoretical working volume ratio X₁ is no less than 11 times and no more than 30 times the dispersion σ.
 6. A lithium secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein the battery capacity is 5 Ah or more.
 7. A lithium secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein the battery is used for an electric vehicle or a hybrid electric vehicle.
 8. A lithium secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein n is at least
 4013. 9. A lithium secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein the battery capacity is at least 20 Ah. 